FHA Is Broke. Now What?

By Ilyce Glink | Sep 18, 2009 |

This morning, the Washington Post reported that the Federal Housing Administration has been hit so hard by mortgage delinquencies and foreclosures, that the FHA would officially drop below the cash reserve level required by Congress.

The problem is two-fold: Congress requires FHA to keep 2 percent of all outstanding loans in cash reserves. As the number of FHA loans has increased exponentially (it is now cheaper in many cases to get an FHA loan than a conventional loan), FHA must keep 2 percent of a much larger number in cash reserves. On the other hand, a growing number of FHA loans are failing, requiring FHA to dip into those cash reserves to pay off FHA foreclosures.

In an interview with the Washington Post, FHA Commissioner David H. Stevens said, “There’s nothing more serious that we’re addressing right now, outside the housing crisis in general, than this issue.”

There are only two ways to truly fix the problem: Increase the amount of mortgage insurance charged to borrowers on FHA loans or ask Congress to dump billions into FHA’s cash reserve fund.

Neither is politically palatable, as the Washington Post observes. If you cut back on FHA and its 3.5 percent payment requirement, you’ll cut the housing recovery off at the knees. Most of the people who use FHA loans don’t have enough cash for a 10, 15, or 20 percent down payment. And, that’s really what you need to get a Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac loan.

But by the same token, if you jack up the mortgage insurance premium you pay for life with your FHA loan, you’ll price some first-time buyers out of the market. Since first-time buyers are the lifeblood of the housing market at the moment, anything that crimps affordability could potentially damage the resurgent market.

The easy, though politically stinky move, is to have Congress simply change or eliminate the amount of cash reserves FHA is required to have and then dump more money into its coffers - perhaps structured as a loan, since FHA has never needed a dime of taxpayer money since it was founded in 1934.

If the cash is structured as a loan, FHA can repay it when times get better.

 
Reply to Story

MoneyWatch TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    ja1515

    09/22/09 | Report as spam

    RE: FHA Is Broke. Now What?

    i wonder if FHA is considered "too big to fail" ?

  •  
    2

    Ilyce Glink

    09/22/09 | Report as spam

    RE: FHA Is Broke. Now What?

    Joseph from Facebook writes:

    Constituionally, the government or any Agency of the government cannot "run out of money", in a Founding Article.

    Inflation/Deflation doesn't pay attention to those small details, I'm afraid.

  •  
    3

    Ilyce Glink

    09/22/09 | Report as spam

    RE: FHA Is Broke. Now What?

    Eugene from Facebook writes:

    HERE WE GO AGAIN W/ THE MEDIA HYPE!!!!!! OH MY GOODNESS...........FHA CANNOT RUN OUT OF MONEY!!!!!! POINT BLANK. ANYONE WHO KNOWS FHA, KNOWS THEY DON'T LEND THE MONEY. THAT'S RIGHT THEY DON'T LEND THE MONEY. FHA INSURES THE LOANS.........THE BANKS AND INVESTORS LEND THE MONEY.

  •  
    4

    Ilyce Glink

    09/22/09 | Report as spam

    RE: FHA Is Broke. Now What?

    Dick from Facebook writes:

    It is the FHA Reserve fund which is running out of money. Treasury or the Fed could give then money or assume the FHA guarantee or the reserve could be waived. No matter what, it is difficult to believe that FHA will not suffer substantial losses. In essence this is an insurance agency and their outflow (losses) may well exceed their income (premiums).

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
Click Here
track your portfolio