Better Foreclosure Numbers? Not Really.

By Ilyce Glink | Nov 12, 2009 |

For the third month in a row, the number of foreclosures decreased slightly.

Is the tide of foreclosures turning? Not really. It’s more like a temporary lull.

In a press release, James J. Saccacio, chief executive officer of RealtyTrac noted that three consecutive monthly declines is unprecedented since the report began and acknowledged that it might seem like the “foreclosure tide may be turning. However, the fundamental forces driving foreclosure activity in this housing downturn — high-risk mortgages, negative equity, and unemployment — continue to loom over any nascent recovery. And despite all the efforts and resources directed at helping homeowners avoid foreclosure, we continue to see foreclosure activity levels that are substantially higher than a year ago in most states.”

According to the latest foreclosure figures from RealtyTrac, the Irvine, Calif.-based foreclosure information service, as many as 3.4 million homes will fall into foreclosure in 2009, a 48 percent spike from 2008.

Rick Sharga, senior vice president of the company, said he also expects a record number of foreclosures in 2010 and 2011 due to the high rate of unemployment.

If we’re at 3.4 million foreclosures in 2009, and Sharga and Saccacio expect “record” numbers in 2010 and 2011, it’s easy to see how foreclosure experts feel comfortable predicting a frightening 7 million foreclosures by the end of 2011.

There are ways the number of expected foreclosures could rise even beyond 7 million:

  • Unemployment could continue to rise. While the official unemployment rate of 10.2 percent is beyond where many economists thought the U.S. would be at this point in time, it’s only expected to go up from here, at least through the middle of 2010. Rising unemployment - or even unemployment that stabilizes around 10 percent - means millions of homeowners won’t be able to afford their mortgage payments.
  • Loan modifications could fail. Lenders have modified hundreds of thousands of mortgages (around 650,000 loan modifications have been done, according to the latest count) under the Making Home Affordable Act. But those loan modifications are temporary and may ultimately not become permanent. Those that aren’t permanently modified will eventually fall into foreclosure or be sold as short sales.
  • The impending commercial real estate crisis could hit harder than expected. When commercial real estate loans fail, developers often go into bankruptcy. If they have personally guaranteed the loans, they’ll be broke - or have much less income than before. Not only will they be at risk for foreclosure, but the owners of the ancillary businesses that depend on the commercial real estate market will be at risk, too, including commercial real estate brokers, agents, appraisers, inspectors, bankers, lawyers, etc.

If this foreclosure future comes to pass, homeowners will be extremely unhappy, particularly in the hardest-hit areas including Nevada, California, Florida, Arizona, Illinois, Michigan, and Georgia. An increasing number of unemployment-driven foreclosures will drive down prices, and who wants to wind up selling a whole neighborhood for $6,500 per house?

Read More:

 
Reply to Story

MoneyWatch TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    nbj914

    11/12/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Better Foreclosure Numbers? Not Really.

    Hey Ilyce: Any idea as to when the commercial real estate market is going to bust and where it will hit the hardest?

  •  
    2

    Ilyce Glink

    11/12/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Better Foreclosure Numbers? Not Really.

    @nbj914:

    I think the commercial real estate market is already starting to crash. Every time you hear about the FDIC shutting down another regional bank, it's largely due to commercial real estate loans going bad. (There may be other contributing factors, this failing commercial real estate loans are a big one.)

    I think we'll really see this start to get going next year and in 2011, but I don't watch the commercial real estate sector as closely as I do the residential real estate world.

  •  
    3

    dallasfire

    11/12/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Better Foreclosure Numbers? Not Really.

    Along with commercial real estate loans drying up, business credit lines have become harder and harder to get and maintain. When the depth of the commercial loan crisis comes to the surface, things are going to get ugly.

  •  
    4

    larry30

    11/13/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Better Foreclosure Numbers? Not Really.

    The reality of Obama's HAMP.."Hurting Any Modification Possibility" Program

    http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2381656/why_obamas_home_affordability_program.html?cat=3

  •  
    5

    larry30

    11/13/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Better Foreclosure Numbers? Not Really.

    The Reality of Obama's HAMP.."Hurting Any Modification Possibility" Program

    http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2381656/why_obamas_home_affordability_program.html?cat=3

  •  
    6

    Ilyce Glink

    11/16/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Better Foreclosure Numbers? Not Really.

    @dallasfire:

    I agree that business credit lines have become more difficult to maintain. But the real issue is that businesses are compressing all over - I can't speak to the abundant joy (for lack of a better word) coming across in today's Dow (up about 148 as I write this) since the small and medium-size businesses I know are looking at big losses.

    And then businesses lose money, they don't have cash to pay things like debt service. Things will get ugly, once the euphoria has subsided.

    Thanks for your comment.

  •  
    7

    Ilyce Glink

    11/16/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Better Foreclosure Numbers? Not Really.

    @Larry30:

    Thanks for your comment. I followed your link to the associated content story and I have to say I was a little confused by what was written there.

    It's no surprise to me that more loans haven't been modified. The whole thing just feels like it isn't going in the right direction.

    But don't focus just on the trial mods being done. You also have to look at the permanent modifications. Under HAMP, it's about 2 percent. That's a pretty lousy number.

    Eventually, the government is going to have to withdraw the life support of the housing industry and that will be something to watch.

    Thanks for your comment.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement
Click Here
track your portfolio