$15,000 Home Buyer Tax Credit Rejected For Cash For Clunkers Bill

By Ilyce Glink | Aug 10, 2009 |

It’s Cash for Clunkers - but for home buyers.

That’s how Sen. Johnny Isakson (R-Ga.) described his $15,000 home buyer tax credit proposal. The proposed legislation would have given a $15,000 tax credit to any home buyer who bought a home, regardless of income. Sen. Isakson’s proposal would have also extended the date of the proposal for a full year from the date of enactment, making home buyers eligible for the tax credit well into 2010.

The proposed $15,000 home buyer tax credit was supported by the National Association of Realtors (NAR), the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) and the Mortgage Bankers Association of America (MBA) - three of the strongest lobbying organization in Washingon, D.C. (FYI: The Realtors are said to be the top lobbyists.) At  one point, even Shaun Donovan, Secretary of the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) was considering it.

But last week, the Senate voted 47 to 50 against lumping Sen. Isakson’s proposed tax credit in with the $2 billion infusion destined for Cash for Clunkers. Isakson then voted against spending an extra $2 billion on Cash for Clunkers. Tit for tat: It’s the Washington way.

Here’s what Isakson had to say on his website about the defeat of his tax credit legislation:

“I’m disappointed in this vote on the homebuyer tax credit, because every American is suffering in this economy. Every American deserves for Congress to look for positive incentives to bring the housing market back, restore their equity, improve their values and return us back to a vibrant economy. The ‘cash for clunkers’ program demonstrates what I’ve known all my life, which is positive incentives cause positive results. The problem we have, though, is it was not the automobile market that disappeared first in America. It was the collapse of housing market.”

Proponents of the bill said it could mean an extra 500,000 homes sold over the year the tax credit is available, or about 9 percent of the total number of homes sold in 2008.

In addition to putting some much-needed commission money into the pocket of a whole bunch of independent contractor Realtors, the real kicker to the economy is how much stuff people buy once they move into a new home. The typical homeowners spends as much as $10,000 to fix up their home. They typically buy new carpets, buff and reseal wood floors, replace appliances, paint, and install window treatments. Some people spend a lot more than that.

Maybe with the way this recession is going, home buyers wouldn’t spend a dime after buying and moving into their new home.

But I don’t buy that.

Home buyers have an insatiable desire to feather their nest. And all that feathering translates into one thing - a huge mound of cash getting recycled into the manufacturing and service sectors of the economy.

Of course, maybe the real estate market will be fine without Sen. Isakson’s $15,000 tax credit. Or, maybe we have to wait and see what happens starting December 1, 2009, when the $8,000 first time home buyer tax credit disappears.

Read the Update:

 
Reply to Story

MoneyWatch TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    ja1515

    08/11/09 | Report as spam

    RE: $15,000 Home Buyer Tax Credit Rejected For Cash For Clunkers Bill

    a new home does look better with new furniture, doesn't it? happy

    i think cash for clunkers would probably be used by more individual people, but a $15k tax credit for home buyers would improve the overall economy more in the long run.

  •  
    2

    jfree85

    08/11/09 | Report as spam

    RE: $15,000 Home Buyer Tax Credit Rejected For Cash For Clunkers Bill

    does cash for clunkers have income restrictions?

  •  
    3

    Ilyce Glink

    08/11/09 | Report as spam

    RE: $15,000 Home Buyer Tax Credit Rejected For Cash For Clunkers Bill

    @Jfree85

    Nope: Cash for Clunkers does not have any income
    restrictions. Some opponents believe it is too generous, since
    you only need to improve your miles per gallon (MPG) by a
    minimum of 2 in some cases to qualify for the $3,500 to
    $4,500 bucks.

    Should there have been an income restriction? Probably. After
    all, there is one on the $8,000 first-time home buyer tax
    credit.

    Thanks for your comment.

  •  
    4

    Ilyce Glink

    08/11/09 | Report as spam

    RE: $15,000 Home Buyer Tax Credit Rejected For Cash For Clunkers Bill

    @JA1515:

    Yes: a new home does look better with new furniture. And
    while you're there, make sure you order new window
    treatments, new dishes, glasses and silverware for your new
    table. You'll need new rugs and while you're at it - how about
    a new car for your driveway?

    I'm joking, of course, but it's easy to see how you can get
    carried away - and blow up your credit card bill.

    To your other point, a $15,000 tax credit for all home buyers
    would have a huge, positive impact on the economy. No way
    to know if that economic benefit would last any longer than
    Cash for Clunkers.

    Thanks for your comment.

  •  
    5

    tedarlinghaus

    08/12/09 | Report as spam

    RE: $15,000 Home Buyer Tax Credit Rejected For Cash For Clunkers Bill

    A $15,000 tax credit for a new home would generate more of
    an impact on the economy than the cash for clunkers. The goverment is putting up 10% and private enterprise is putting up 90%. If the average purchase price is $22,500 the cash for clunkers the goverment is putting up 20% and private enterprise is putting up 80%. In addition, any new home over $150,000 the % put up by the goverment would be less than 10%. Congress needs to consider a $15,000 New Home Buyer Tax Credit.

  •  
    6

    Ilyce Glink

    08/17/09 | Report as spam

    RE: $15,000 Home Buyer Tax Credit Rejected For Cash For Clunkers Bill

    @tedarlinghaus:

    I think a $15,000 home buyer tax credit (not only for first-time buyers or new home buyers, but all home buyers who are purchasing a home to live in) would give the economy a real kick in the pants.

    But, I don't think much will happen until October - if then.

    Thanks for your comment.

  •  
    7

    Ilyce Glink

    08/18/09 | Report as spam

    RE: $15,000 Home Buyer Tax Credit Rejected For Cash For Clunkers Bill

    From Wendy, on Active Rain:

    I would have thought that the 15k proposal would have a far more greater positive impact to the economy, affecting more services, and individuals than the disposable asset of a car! Thanks for the info.

  •  
    8

    DemetriusW

    08/19/09 | Report as spam

    RE: $15,000 Home Buyer Tax Credit Rejected For Cash For Clunkers Bill

    Senate Republican leaders are railing against the Cash for Clunkers Bill, calling the program a model of government inefficiency and out-of-control spending. Republicans have made it known that they do not like the Cash for Clunkers bill. John McCain certainly doesn't like the Cash for Clunkers bill ? or anything good for anyone ? and he is also a vocal opponent of the health care reform package, which is seen as a step towards universal health care, or Obamacare as it's described in the press. The Republican Party seems bent on putting short term loans and whatever else they can into stopping many of Obama's programs, regardless of how good of ideas they may be. The Cash for Clunkers bill might save people from needing no fax payday loans for a car payment, and stimulate auto sales if it's allowed to work.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
Click Here
track your portfolio