Kathy Kristof

Devil in the Details

Credit Slashed for 33 Million (Mostly Innocent) Borrowers

By Kathy Kristof | Aug 21, 2009 |

Lenders are cutting credit limits and cancelling cards, even when credit behavior is innocent.

Lenders are cutting credit limits and cancelling cards, even when credit behavior is innocent.

Some 33 million people, roughly one in five borrowers, had their credit limits slashed over the past six months–mostly without provocation, according to new research by Fair Isaac Co., the company that created FICO credit scores.

The average consumer lost 14% of their borrowing power in this latest wave of cuts, as lenders took away an average of $5,100 in borrowing power by either cutting consumer credit limits or closing accounts. A similar study conducted six months earlier showed a much more modest cut in credit limits, as the average person lost 5%, or $2,200, in borrowing power.

The vast majority of consumers who lost borrowing power appear to have done nothing to provoke the cut, such as make late payments or start borrowing more heavily, said Craig Watts, spokesman for Fair Isaac in San Francisco. Watts qualified that Fair Isaac is not privy to every factor that would affect credit decisions, but there was no sign of trouble on 25 million credit reports out of the 33 million that saw their credit lines cut, he said.

Unprovoked cuts to credit limits, a common complaint during the current credit crisis, have sparked worries that innocent consumers could find their credit scores savaged, making it harder to borrow at decent rates in the future. That’s because credit “utilization” is a significant factor in determining your FICO score, which is a number between 300 and 850 that aims to handicap the likelihood that you’ll repay your debts.

Credit utilization rates are determined by comparing the amount of debt you have outstanding to the amount you have available. If you have $100,000 in available credit, but are only using $50,000, you’re utilization is 50%, for example. When credit limits are cut, utilization figures are arbitrarily raised. If lenders took away $20,000 in borrowing power from this hypothetical consumer, for instance, he’d suddenly see his utilization rate soar to 62.5%, without adding a penny to his debt.

Fair Isaac says heavy debt utilization is a significant determinant of credit risk. Those who utilize 70% of their available credit are up to 50 times more likely to default on their debts than those who utilize 10% or less.

However, the study found that the impact to FICO scores has been mostly modest, perhaps because consumers have been paying off their debts as fast as their banks could slash their limits. The bulk of the 25 million people who had unprovoked credit limit cuts had a relatively minor 20 point swing in their before-and-after credit scores, according to the study. And, ironically, more scores rose than fell. The average FICO score for this group was 760, according to the study, which is good enough for the best credit offers.

Only a relative handful of consumers saw their scores drop by 40 points or more. Watts speculates that these were people with “thin files,” or those who had few loans outstanding and had relatively short borrowing histories.

Watts gives little advice to those who had their credit limits arbitrarily slashed, except to say that the best scores go to those who follow Grandma’s advice: Borrow sparingly and pay your bills on time. That advice stays true in both good times and today’s rotten credit environment.

 
Reply to Story

MoneyWatch TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    debtgazette

    08/21/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Credit Slashed for 33 Million (Mostly Innocent) Borrowers

    I don't really buy FICO's claims that people's credit scores weren't really hurt by the vast number of credit limit cuts. Even if you don't use the card or rarely use the card,a limit cut will still affect your amount of available credit which is a key component of your credit score.

    All this stuff has just been the credit card companies pre-reaction to the legislation that is being put in. Their gonna get their money no matter what. Its in their best interest for people to have lower credit scores. Its going to be harder for them to raise your rate, so they have to make that intial rate as high as possible.

    I think the credit card companies greed is holding the country back from emerging from this recession. Check out my blog about this situation at.... http://www.thedebtgazette.com/2009/08/58-million-credit-limits-cut-in-past-year/

  •  
    2

    Kathy Kristof

    08/21/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Credit Slashed for 33 Million (Mostly Innocent) Borrowers

    I like your blog. As for the FICO scores, credit utilization is an
    important component of your score, accounting for about one-
    third of the "amounts owed" category, which accounts for 30%
    of your score. The fact that lenders have been cutting limits
    should cause scores to drop. But consumers have been cutting
    their use of credit and paying off their debts (we have other
    Fed data on that), so I think they're mitigating the impact on
    their own scores.

  •  
    3

    S.Howard-Sarin

    08/25/09 | Report as spam

    There's something so absurd about this

    I know people who are really feeling the pain of these credit-limit cuts, however...

    It's just nuts the amount of credit that people -- including me! -- have been able to accumulate in the past 10 years. And the fact that we're rewarded with better FICO scores for having mounds of unused debt capacity? Well, it's twisted.

    Lately I've rediscovered the virtues of my lowly $8,000-limit bank credit card. It's like a speed limit on a neighborhood street: If I start bumping up against the limit, I am doing something wrong.

  •  
    4

    Kathy Kristof

    08/25/09 | Report as spam

    Re: There's something so absurd....

    The one bright side I see with this recession and credit
    crunch is that people are paying off their debts. And when
    they finish paying for last year's excesses, they're able to live
    so much more comfortably on so much less.
    I know that in the short run, it is causing pain. But when the
    pain is about not being able to get into more debt, I'm not
    sure that its not like the pain of a vaccination. It pinches,
    but it's good for you.
    I'm a big advocate of living a calm life. You can't do that
    when you're in hock.

  •  
    5

    radio123

    08/31/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Credit Slashed for 33 Million (Mostly Innocent) Borrowers

    what your story doesn't tell is from the consumers point of view. the dominoes effect that if one creditor slashes credit then the other will follow. that the persons score then revivals that of someone that declares bankruptcy and to no fault of their own and they only way out is to pay it all off the whole time their rate went from hardly reasonable to absolutely absurd

  •  
    6

    Kathy Kristof

    08/31/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Credit Slashed for 33 Million (Mostly Innocent) Borrowers

    That doesn't usually happen, unless there's some reason behind
    it. In fact, if you call your credit card issuer--the card that you
    use the most--you may be able to get your credit limit hiked, if
    you're solvent and reliable. If you have cards that you don't use
    much, they're the most susceptible to being cancelled or cut.
    Start charging a few things each month to keep that credit, but
    pay if off. I'm never going to tell a reader to pay interest at
    double-digit rates, if they can help it.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here

Kathy Kristof

Kathy Kristof is a syndicated personal finance columnist, speaker and author of three books, including the recently updated Investing 101 (Bloomberg, 2008).

Kathy Kristof

Click Here
track your portfolio