Charlie Farrell

Retirement Roadmap
Learn More

401(k) vs The Pension, Which Is Better?

By Charlie Farrell | Jul 9, 2009 |

I’ve seen a number of recent articles trashing the 401(k) as a retirement savings vehicle. Clearly, there are problems with how effectively people use 401(k)s. But advocating for more company pensions or lifetime income annuities from insurance companies won’t take the risk out of saving for retirement. In fact, these options may create bigger risks that you can’t control.

Risk Doesn’t Disappear. No matter who’s responsible for your retirement, the risk is still there. Turning it over to someone else doesn’t make it go away. It just makes you completely dependent on them doing it right. And if they don’t, you won’t have many options to fix it.

So as tough as it is to save on your own, and make decisions about how to invest your money, I think you’re better off taking on that responsibility. But that’s just my opinion.

To give you something to think about, let’s take a look at the company pension and insurance company annuity options.

Company Pension. Having your employer manage your retirement plan is no panacea. The employer has to do the same things you have to do: fund it adequately and invest it prudently. Unfortunately, they don’t always do both. Company fortunes rise and fall, along with their commitments to funding your retirement. Plenty of private and public pension plans are currenlty underfunded, and have been hit hard by the recent financial meltdown with big losses.  

  • Over the years, we’ve also had numerous high profile retirement plan failures, most notably in the airline and automobile sectors.  These workers thought they were guaranteed gold plated retirements. It didn’t work out that way.  So letting your employer have total control over your life’s savings may not be such a hot idea after all. 
  • See my recent post on “Will Traditional Pensions Make A Comeback?” for more discussion on the topic.

Insurance Companies. You could give your retirement savings to an insurance company in exchange for a lifetime income annuity (which is similar to a pension). They’re conservative, right?  Well, AIG was and still is one of the biggest underwriters of annuities.  How comfortable do you feel giving AIG your retirement money?  Remember, a guarantee is only as good as the company backing it.

  • In fact, a number of major insurers almost went belly-up in this recent crisis because they got too aggressive with the guarantees they made on certain retirement income annuities.

Own It. So if those options make you uncomfortable, what are you left with?  Handling the money yourself.  You can do that through a number of different accounts, like the 401(k), IRA or a regular brokerage account.  The 401(k) is generally the first choice because of the high contributon limits, tax deductions and (in many cases) employer match.

If you’re responsible for your own retirement plan, you can save as much as you want and you can invest as you see fit.  If you fund it adequately and manage it prudently, you should do just fine. And you won’t wake up 30 years from now surprised that someone else didn’t do their job when it came to securing your retirement. That’s a risk you can’t control.

Bottom line. There are no easy answers to the retirement challenge. But when push comes to shove, I’d rather have control over my money.  That’s a valuable right, and I wouldn’t be so quick to give it up.

Photo from Flickr, courtesy of BruceTurner, CC 2.0

 
Reply to Story

MoneyWatch TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Eric Schurenberg

    07/13/09 | Report as spam

    RE: 401(k) vs The Pension, Which Is Better?

    This is a great post, Charlie. There has been a lot of revisionist history lately about how great pensions are, or were. But the fact is, as you said, the risk doesn't go away just because a pension fobs the responsibility off onto an employer.
    Other problems with pensions: lack of portability, back-end loading (a pension only really starts to get valuable when you're old and have been at an employer for a long time--and who does that any more), lack of visibility (it's hard to tell how much the thing is worth) and corporate risk (what happens if your company is taken over by one that has no pension).
    Over-reliance on the 401(k) has left a generation without adequate income security. But that doesn't mean that a return to old-fashioned pensions, even if possible, is the solution.

  •  
    2

    Charles Farrell

    07/13/09 | Report as spam

    RE: 401(k) vs The Pension, Which Is Better?

    Thanks for the note Eric. The main problem with whatever retirement plan structure we use is that, in general, the savings (or contribution rate) is too low for our expected or promised retirement lifestyles. We're just not putting away enough at a corporate, government or personal level. And when market returns fall, they expose the funding cracks in the system.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here

Charlie Farrell

Charles Farrell, J.D., LL.M. is an investment advisor with Northstar Investment Advisors in Denver, Colorado. He works primarily with individuals and families on the management and funding of their retirement savings, and is a former tax attorney. His research on retirement and investing has been widely published in major media outlets including The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, Journal of Financial Planning, and The Investment News.

Charlie Farrell

Click Here
track your portfolio