Eric Schurenberg

Financial Independence
Learn More

Social Security: The Red Ink Starts Next Year

By Eric Schurenberg | Sep 30, 2009 |

Just in case there was any doubt that Social Security won’t be able to keep the promises it is making to anyone younger than, say, 55, the Congressional Budget Office now projects that Social Security will start operating at a deficit next year. Neither the CBO nor Social Security itself had expected the red ink to start flowing before 2016, but the recessionary surge in unemployment and early retirements changed the outlook.  The CBO’s updated forecast, reported by the Associated Press, now sees costs pushing above tax revenues by $10 billion in 2010 and $9 billion in 2011, before the system goes temporarily back into the black again until 2016.

As a practical matter, you won’t notice. Because of the trust fund , the system will be able to pay all its checks on time.

But that doesn’t mean it doesn’t matter. For the first time Social Security will start to add to the deficit rather than subtracting from it. And while adding $19 billion over two years to the federal debt doesn’t sound like much in this era of $787 bailouts, it’s just the first trickle of a red ink flash flood that starts in earnest in 2016. This is a big deal.

Remember, the trust fund isn’t like a pile of money in a bank vault that Social Security can just open when it needs cash. It’s actually just a stack of IOUs from Uncle Sam. It means, in essence, that Social Security has the authority to order the Treasury to pay beneficiaries. Where the Treasury gets the money-by raising taxes, cutting benefits elsewhere in government or borrowing more from the Chinese-is up to Congress.

After a while, we’re going to get tired of this. Social Security’s authority to boss the Treasury around doesn’t run out until the trust fund is exhausted decades from now. Way before then we will have to face the fact that Social Security’s costs are unsustainable. Some combination of tax hikes or benefit cuts are going to have to be put in place. And the longer we wait to face reality on Social Security, the more painful those measures will be.  Obama has said that fixing Social Security is on his agenda for next year. Let’s hope so.

More on MoneyWatch:

How to Pay for Social Security

Social Security Strategies: Former Spouses

Are You Saving Enough for Retirement?

 
Reply to Story

MoneyWatch TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    steve.mathys

    10/02/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Social Security: The Red Ink Starts Next Year

    I would like to advocate for voluntary exit from the Social Security fund. Once a person reaches at least 40 quarters of paying in, they may opt out of any future benefits, in exchange for opting out of both their own share and the employer's share of the tax paid. If I had an additional 12.4% of my salary back to me, I'd sure as heck have a better retirement plan, a better disability plan, and more life insurance than I'll get under SS.

    You might ask, "how does taking money out of SS help?" It's because the benefits are taken out, too. I give up all rights to any benefit accruals I've accumulated over the past years.

    As for the 40 quarters, we can decide how many that would need to be, or if age limits are also appropriate. What do you think?

  •  
    2

    april.quinn@...

    10/02/09 | Report as spam

    Opting out

    I agree wholeheartedly! It seems clear that by the time I
    retire I won't be getting a cent--so why keep making
    deposits into an account I'll never get to close?

    The issue with this is that while grandma and grandpa did
    contribute all those years, they still depend on the younger
    generations to keep contributing so they can make their
    "withdrawals." If we decide to "opt out" what happens to
    them?

    Unfortunately, this doesn't seem like a fair solution for those
    who trusted the system when they didn't have the option to
    "opt out." It's a shame, cause I'm sure I'd be able to invest
    that 12.4% myself and get a better return than I'll ever see
    from SS.

  •  
    3

    eshortstop

    10/03/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Social Security: The Red Ink Starts Next Year

    April is right. The problem with an opt-out provision from Social Security is that if workers can choose not to contribute, the penalty is paid not just by them but also by current beneficiaries. Social Security is a transfer tax; if you're not paying in, beneficiaries don't get paid. This was a key reason the Bush private accounts plan didn't work.
    As for return on your "investment" in Social Security: That's been a losing proposition for years, and it's getting worse.

  •  
    4

    Ciceronius

    10/06/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Social Security: The Red Ink Starts Next Year

    I don't think this system can be fixed. If anything, Social Security should be some kind of account that each person is entitled to have. What they get out of it, is strictly what they put in, and nothing else.

    This way, those who opt-out can just do away with this brokeness. Those who want to stay in, well, they're not helping to pay for anyone else but themselves.

    Social Security is starting to look like a huge pyramid scheme gone awry.



  •  
    5

    MrRosemary

    10/14/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Social Security: The Red Ink Starts Next Year

    But if you selfish pigs opt out, who will be funding bingo night and the new Buick?

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here

Eric Schurenberg

Eric Schurenberg is Editor-in-Chief of BNET.com and Editorial Director of CBS MoneyWatch.com. Previously, Eric was managing editor of MONEY. As managing editor, he expanded the editorial focus to new interests including real estate, family finance, health, retirement, and the workplace. Prior to MONEY, Eric was deputy editor of Business 2.0. He was also the managing editor of goldman.com, a Web site for Goldman Sachs Group's personal wealth management business, and an assistant managing editor at Fortune magazine. Schurenberg has won a Gerald Loeb Award for distinguished business journalism, a National Magazine Award, and a Page One Award.

Eric Schurenberg

Click Here
track your portfolio