Your Future

Topics
Learn More

The 12 Dumbest 401(k) Mistakes

The 401(k) has come under fire recently, right here on MoneyWatch and then from both The New York Times and Time magazine. But for all its faults, it may be the single most important asset in your financial future. Until someone comes up with a better way to save for retirement, your only choice is to save as much as you can and invest it intelligently. In other words, love the one you're with. "For most people, this is the biggest bucket of money they're going to have when they retire," says Houston financial planner Gary Busch. "So it's important to be doing a good job with it."

Here are the 12 dumbest mistakes that financial pros say you can make with your 401(k) — or 403(b) — along with our advice on how to avoid them.

1. Missing the Match

First things first: Enroll. It goes without saying that unless you are independently wealthy and you go to the office just for kicks, you ought to be investing in your 401(k) plan. But even if you’ve got a different retirement savings approach — say, a Roth IRA — at the very least, invest enough in your 401(k) to get the full company match. Although 11 percent of employers have recently dropped this feature, most still hand out free money. Take it.

2. Betting on the Company

When Enron imploded in 2001 and its stock became worthless, many employees lost not only their jobs but also their retirement savings. Employees had roughly $1 billion in company shares. And yet investors continue to make the same mistake: In plans where company shares are an investment choice, about a third of employees have more than 20 percent of their money in the stock. That’s putting too much faith in one business and violating a basic tenet of investing: diversification. After all, your income is already tied to your company’s fortunes. If the business collapses — and recent history suggests that no company is invulnerable — you don’t want your retirement to collapse as well.

Bottom line: Never invest more than 5 percent of your 401(k) in the company that employs you.

3. Freezing Contributions

When first enrolling in a 401(k), it’s fairly common for employees to set their contribution level at 6 percent, often the minimum required to get the full match. But if you haven’t increased the contribution despite subsequent raises and bonuses, hop to it. “A lot of people lock in a percentage,” says Cheryl Krueger, a financial planner in Schaumburg, Ill. “But if they get a 3 percent raise, they could easily increase their contribution a percentage point or two and still end up with more money in their paycheck.”

When your salary goes up, boost your 401(k) contribution, too. Some companies allow you to set up your plan so that your contribution increases automatically; if so, take advantage.

4. Cashing Out

Nearly half of employees withdraw their 401(k) savings when leaving one company for another. Big mistake. “People don’t realize that they don’t have to cash out,” says Mike Alfred, CEO of BrightScope, a 401(k) rating site. “We call it ‘leakage.’ They could roll the money into a new 401(k) or IRA.”

Taking the 401(k) cash as an immediate payout means owing taxes on the money plus a 10 percent early-withdrawal penalty if you’re under 55. Not to mention that you’re robbing from your retirement by pocketing the money now.

5. Misusing Target-Date Funds

About a third of 401(k) participants invest in target-date funds (at some companies, these funds are the default option), but many don’t know how to use them. These accounts allocate assets based on the year you plan to retire and are meant to provide one-stop investing. Vanguard’s Target Retirement 2030 Fund (VTHRX), for instance, divides contributions among domestic stocks and bonds and international stocks in a ratio designed for someone retiring in 21 years (now 67 percent U.S. stocks, 16 percent bonds, 17 percent international stocks). But some employees invest in multiple target-date funds with different dates, defeating the purpose.

“I wouldn’t say it’s disastrous, but it just doesn’t make any sense,” says Seattle financial planner David Lamp. Be sure to evaluate the allocations in your 401(k)’s target-date funds before investing to see that they square with your appetite for risk. As MoneyWatch blogger Nathan Hale reported, 2010 target-date funds — designed for investors planning to retire next year — lost an average of 23 percent last year because they were heavy in stocks.

6. Failing to Rebalance

When you first signed up, you decided what percentage of your 401(k) would be in stocks, bonds, and cash. But over time, those percentages have changed, depending on how their underlying investments have performed. If you haven’t rebalanced in recent years, your mix is probably quite different from what you had originally planned. During the market collapse in 2008, for example, your stock allocation shrank in relation to your bond allocation. Yet more than half of 401(k) employees didn’t rebalance, according to retirement plan adviser I-Pension. (About a quarter didn’t even open their statements, but that’s another story.)

Aim to get your 401(k) ducks back in a row annually. Had you rebalanced at the end of 2008, for example, you would have been selling Treasury bonds near an all-time high and adding more exposure to stocks, which started to rally in March.

7. Taking Too Much Risk

Inertia can be a force for good if it keeps you from trading too much and chasing winners, but it can cause problems if you don’t adjust your investment mix as you age. “As you get older, your allocation should change. You want to put less money into stocks to get a more conservative allocation,” Krueger says.

Remaining aggressive could mean delaying retirement or reducing your post-work standard of living if your retirement date coincides with a bear market. Go too conservative, however, and your nest egg might not be big enough. Talk to a planner to determine the proper mix or do your own calculations with tools such as the Asset Allocator at Sink or Swim and this investor questionnaire at Vanguard’s Web site.

8. Ducking Out

When the market collapsed last year, taking your 401(k) portfolio with it, panic was a perfectly understandable reaction. But the key is to make investment decisions based on logic, not emotion. Employees who resisted the flight response and consistently participated in their plans from 2003 through 2008 had an average annual return of 7.2 percent, even including 2008’s losses, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute.

“Emotional investing decisions are almost always bad decisions,” says Chicago financial planner Chris Long. “To be a good investor, you can’t make short-term decisions for long-term money.”

Remember: One of the great things about a 401(k) plan is that you are dollar-cost averaging into the market — investing the same amount at regular intervals — so you end up buying more shares when they’re cheap and fewer when they’re expensive. If you stop buying during a trough, you’re missing the bargains. “Most stuff is still cheaper now than it was in November 2007,” says Busch.

9. Holding On to Lousy Funds

Don’t stick with a 401(k) fund that has performed worse than its peers year after year because you hope to recoup your losses someday. The test: If you wouldn’t want to buy the fund initially today, you probably shouldn’t own it anymore. We’re not suggesting that you dump your stocks — only that you look for another portfolio, preferably a low-cost index fund.

10. Getting Socked by High Fees

Your 401(k) provider loves telling you about its funds’ investment styles, and you may get to see performance numbers, but it’s not easy to figure out what fees you’re paying. If the funds in your 401(k) have a high expense ratio, your returns will be snipped substantially. Your best bet is almost always a low-cost index fund; the cheapest charge less than 0.1 percent of assets. If you must invest in actively managed funds, try to stick with expense ratios below 1 percent. But since fees vary by type of fund (bond funds are typically cheaper than stock funds, for instance), compare within asset classes as well.

“The key is to look at fund expenses relative to others in that asset class, rather than on an absolute basis,” Busch says. Your benefits department should be able to get you fee information, but also check BrightScope’s “Total Plan Cost” for your company to see how its 401(k) fees (which you are paying in addition to fund expense ratios) compare with the universe of plans.

11. Treating Your 401(k) Like an Island

It’s essential to be sure your plan’s holdings fit properly with the rest of your portfolio. Otherwise, you may have too much of your wealth tied up in one type of investment. Busch, for example, recently discovered that a client had a brokerage account invested in the same types of large-cap stocks that made up his retirement portfolio. “I had to adjust the allocation in his retirement plan,” Busch says.

12. Borrowing from Your Future

When money’s tight, it can be tempting to dip into your 401(k). After all, you’ll just be paying yourself back with interest (current rate: about 4.25 percent), right? Wrong. For one thing, if you lose your job or take another one, you must repay the money within 30 to 60 days. If you can’t, the IRS considers the money you’ve taken out to be a withdrawal, and charges you taxes and penalties on it. Keep your mitts off your 401(k) and you’ll thank yourself when retirement arrives.

More on MoneyWatch:

 
Reply to Story

MoneyWatch TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    Eric Schurenberg

    10/28/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The 12 Dumbest 401(k) Mistakes

    #2 is really good advice. Getting out of the company stock is never a bad decision because it increases your diversification. Think of it this way: You never know whether your company stock will do better or worse than the stock market. (And I worked for Time Warner most of my career; ever wonder what if feels like to see your company stock decline 80% over a decade?) But you ALWAYS know that your financial risk level will be lower if you diversify out of your company stock. That's a no brainer.

  •  
    2

    financial advisor

    11/03/09 | Report as spam

    Mel Marten

    Our company matches investors to financial advisors, so we see lots of issues. The above list is great. I would say I see another problem also- Most people don't have any financial advice when picking their 401k investments!

    Without advice, many people invest in company stock (as you mention), they are under-diversified (they put everything into 2 aggressive stock funds), or they are over-diversified (they invest a little in every fund choice they have).

    A financial advisor can help you choose the investments in your 401k so they are appropriate and fit in with your financial plan.

    Mel Marten, CFA / Founder, http://www.claroconnect.com

  •  
    3

    Rick Stringer

    11/03/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The 12 Dumbest 401(k) Mistakes

    Add one more: Failure to name beneficiaries!

  •  
    4

    mpollak@...

    11/03/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The 12 Dumbest 401(k) Mistakes

    I have idea for Retirement Fund that would be able to pay 20% on deposited money every year, from the start. It would also earn you at least double of deposited money each 36 months, so when your savings are consolidated for next cycle, you start with 300% compared to initially deposited money, so 20% on that is again guaranteed on whole money you have. That way anybody can >>retire<< oneself as soon as this guaranteed 20% become enough for normal living, as after 3 years it would be raised by at least 200%, and it would continue to grow. Since such Fund would be building factories and instalations (such as Power Stations using Wind and Solar power), that would bring new employment and new taxes to government, as employeed people would get paid (and participate in profit earned in size of 30%), so they would buy products of other factories and pay VAT and Profit tax as well. Members of Fund would also get priority to get instalation or factory for manegement and kind of ownership without right to sell donated factory or instalation, and when such owner do not earn profit as planned due to mismanagement, it has to be returned to Fund which would assign new manager/owner. But that cannot happen unless person is realy incompetent since that person would take money out of own pocket, because such owner/manager would get another 40% of profit made by factory or instalation. Factory or instalation could become collective owned by its employees, if no Fund Member is capable of running it and no outside manager could be found.
    Profit would be assigned according to number of years that empolyee work for factory or instalation and size of salary received, to promote company loyalty. To increase employees earnings, profit would be paid to Fund as each employee would be Member of Fund, and they would receive same benefits as other Members of Fund, including right to get new factory of same kind they are working in in private (conditional) ownership. Since they would allready know how such factory or instalation is run from working in it, they would be >>trained on JOB<< to be managers of same kind of factory, and receive 40% of profit share. Of course, every Member of Fund could decide to retire at any time, managers/owners included, and then they have to return factory or instalation to Fund which would assign new manager/owner, or new (Conditional) owner would be choosen from employees, even by employees themself or by decision od owner that is going to retire. If factory or instalation is in collective ownership of employees, they can elect new manager or decide to hire one from outside.
    Any enlargement or restructuring or reprogramming of factory or instalation would be done by Fund as new investment, to enable factory or instalation to continue earning profit, because 30% of profit would be paid to Fund.
    Fund would be run by team of experts in technology, economy, ecology, marketing and so on, that would find usefull and therefore marketable products that would be profitable enough to pay back factory or instalation in at most 8 months, and continue earning same level of profit.
    From this 30% of profit received, Fund would allocate 20% to Members, 3% would be incentive for its Board of Experts and other personell working for Fund (but deposited to Fund as they would also be Members), 5% would be for stimulation of Research and Development and 2% would be for me as one who would make database program and organize Fund's functioning. Of course, I would be Member of Fund also and have all rights as other Members.
    Since Fund would use only money, any member can withdraw as much as needed and is available in case of emergency, but not at least first three years and after at most each 6 years. This is possible since Fund would continue to pay Member guaranted 20% but in 1/4 of amount it was paid before withdrawal, and it would take at least 6 years to reach same amount that Member had before withdrawing money. Guaranteed 20% can be spent, partly or mostly redeposited as Member would wish. Membership would be inheritable with same benefits as guaranteed to original Member, so payment would not stop like it is in ordinary Retirement funds.
    That way unemployment would soon be liquidated, as employer can retire old workers by paying double net salary to employee, one to employee and one to Fund under employee name, or if it is urgent, by one time payment of 5 years net salary as Members deposit in Fund.
    If anybody would be interested to implement this idea, please leave post with your email address so I could contact you.
    Regards from Zagreb, the capitol of Croatia, Europe!

  •  
    5

    S.Howard-Sarin

    11/09/09 | Report as spam

    @Rick Stringer: Good point!

    Failing to name a beneficiary should definitely have made the list.

    @mpollak: Is your company the Zagreb Sea Company, perchance? I'm tempted to flag your message as spam -- you are seeking investors, after all -- but I'm leaving it up for now because it's so entertaining. It's like a 13th Mistake: investing for your retirement in speculative, "can't-lose" business ideas.

  •  
    6

    facts

    11/09/09 | Report as spam

    Samuel N. Asare of Laser Financial Group

    I agree that the key is to make investment decisions based on logic, not emotion."

    Has any of these so-called financial gurus actually met with a retired client? Because, those who are meeting with us daily are not satisfied at all with their 401ks and 403bs.

    Can any advisor tell us if in the so called long-term (whenever that is) market risk will be eliminated and everyone will retire good?

    How many clients under the direct supervision of advisors escaped the evaporation of their retirement assets?

    Should people use a 401k simply because there is a match? a bunch have been doing that since 1980 where are their portflios today?

    Get the facts http://www.laserFG.com



  •  
    7

    mpollak@...

    11/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The 12 Dumbest 401(k) Mistakes

    Honored Mr./Mrs./Miss S.Howard-Sarin,

    Must be You are Moderator here, so I thank You for leaving my post, since maybe someone would understand what I am talking about.

    If You read carefully, then You would see that I cannot earn anything if my financing system would not work, and since it would not be implemented by me, I cannot get any benefits any other way but to prove it is working first.

    I mentioned it here because this Blog is about Retirement Funds, but since it works trough building factories and instalations, which would bring employment and usefull and affordable products or cheap and >>green<< energy, this would bve also ideal Investment Fund, and it could even be used by governments in something like >>Industrialization Fund<< to multiply Budget money instaed of just spending it, or can be used internaly in any big corporation, even in Charity funds, specially because it gives away factories and Instalations for FREE in conditional ownership, condition being that factory or instalation would be well managed and continue to provide employment and profit, specially because this profit is partly paid back to Fund.
    From this paid back profit would come promised 20% and multiplication of Members money, it would not fall from the sky.......
    It is reasonable to expect that more people are employeed, more salaries would be paid, and here they would be augumented by participation in one part of profit earned by factory or instalation, from which follows that more products of other factories would be bought, and with more sales, production would grow bringing more profit and more employment........
    Therefore, present negative trend would be rewersed, so people would be able to pay their mortgage and so they would not lost their homes, nor would insurance companies and Banks collapse.......
    In short, Your conclusion was little premature, but I understand that after big scandall in last December with Mr. Maddock, everybody is double suspicious than before.
    Point is, I could prove it would work perfectly, and if I dont suceed to prove it, then it would not be implemented.
    I stake my good name on it. Whoever challenge me to prove it works, I am ready that in case of failure my name would be listed together with Mr. Maddock's and I may be accused for atempting to befraud people.
    Imagine for the moment that all what I wrote is true and can be proven to work, would that not be great way to get retired?
    Incidentaly, You are right, I seek Investors, but for my inventions, such as new kind of Wind and Solar Power stations that can produce electricity at cost of 10$ per MWh, while in my country cheapest tariff is 600$ per MWh.
    If somebody implement my Financing plan, then such Fund can build factories that would produce parts for my Power stations, and at same time give them market by also building and installing numerous Power Stations that would be very profitable by themself, which would in turn make everything cheaper if electricity price drop in half and factories use their captive plants, thus saving even 99.9% of electricity price.
    If You are at least remotely aware of how Ecconomy function, then You would find that there are only benefits for everybody, with exception of Oil ang Gas producing companies. Even automobile industry would profit trough mass production of electromobiles that would become affordable if mass produced, and cheap for use if electricity is cheap also.
    Moreover, I know how to remove surplus CO2 from atmosphere fast and permanently while producing usefull products, and that would lessen or even stop effects of Global Warming process, thus precluding Polar ice meltdown because of which sea level would rise 6 to 22 meters high, flooding harbours, islands, river deltas and so on, with great loss of property and lives trough wars for land that would surely follow, and lives of those people who would surely die of hunger...
    My Water production instalations could be built on agriculturall scale, thus freeing people of dependence on natural percipitation, and provide good water for people and their livestock as well, which would create conditions for growing crops, vegetables, fruits, trees or just grass for catle to graze, using just sunshine, of which there is plenty in hot and dry climates, and just water is lacking, because of which people are chronically hungry and periodically starving, specialy now when temperatures are rising because of Global Warming process.......

    Therefore, PLEASE, read carefully what I am writting, as I intend to save world, really, not looking just for profit I can earn. I have it all ready or nearly finalized, but need really symbolic amount of money since my computer is old and engineering simulation software cost. If such Retirement Fund can be started, then i believe it would be better that people get profit than just single company which can be in sole private property, thus making someone rich still richer, specially since such company would keep ownership of everything built and reap all possible profit there would be.

    If You can help, I could explain to You all to last detail, and then You would see this is salvation and best decision there could be for investment of any kind, and most of all for purpose of retirement or life savings......

    Regards from Croatia, homeland of one of greatest inventors, Enginer Nikola Tesla!

  •  
    8

    mpollak@...

    11/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The 12 Dumbest 401(k) Mistakes

    @S.Howard-Sarin

    No, my company name is OBERON d.o.o. (Ltd.), but I did not mention it since my business Bank collapsed taking down with it over 60 000 out of 77 000 companies that had their money deposited there. Thus I lost my liquid assets together with few big client companies that perished leaving big bills unpaid, because of which I was unable to pay debt to AMEX Company Card Bank, which in turn froze my company accounts, so I was not able to do any business or get any credit from other Banks that survived.
    If it would not have happened, I would be able to finance it all by myself, and I would found that Retirement fund as well.
    Unfortunately nobody right now dare to invest money in anything, and worse still, those who understand how big profit could be gained from my inventions become greedy and would like to do it all by themself, and when they find that they cannot start production also, they give up completely :-((
    Actually, I have factories ready to start production, but they require that I patent this all first and make engineering plans, which also cost, and so here I am, looking for someone to invest little money and get back at least 10 times to 100 times more in just one year.
    Unfortunately, my country is poor, and those who have had money lost greatly when value od company shares they invested in fell, where they considered this to be more safe than to invest in my inventions........
    But what can I do, people with money mostly dont understand technology, so they want detailed business plan, and such must include costs that I can only roughly calculate without finding optimal design of my instalations.
    People I tried to contact that should be interested very much are >>protected<< by secretaries who delete all mail even without being read, or autoresponse programs that send some standard excuse, also not reading emails at all.
    So I offered cheap and failsafe, more productive Wind Power Stations to Mr. T. Boone Pickens, >>King of Wind<<, to get reply that >>they are currently concentrated on their present project so they cannot invest in my inventions, thank You!<< and I read on WEB that he is ready to give up on his last Windfarm project for lack of investment......
    Just by using my financing system he can build at least 10 times greater capacity for electricity production, and it would pay for itself completely, enabling more and more instalations to be built.
    But, What can I do, I cannot reach him and explain that my Windpower Stations have ZERO land footprint, that there is no need for acces ways to be built nir speciall cranes used, that they do not spend any electricity so they would not bring Grid down when starting, that they need not be stopped in strong wind and are cheap to build and require no maintenance save for generator unit, that they can be installed in much closer groups, use weaker wind, could be >>tailored<< to location in order to use whole scale of wind speeds, starting from 3m/sec instead usuall 11m/sec, and because of which they can be installed nearly everywhere...
    Same way I tried to contact Mr. Obama, Mr. Al Gore, and many other people without sucess.......
    My only hope is that someone would read my posts, even for that short time they are allowed to show themself on Bnet Blogs, as everybody interpret them wrong way, not seeing benefits that would be gained Worldwide......
    Regards, Marijan Pollak, IT SA SE 1st. Class, Instructor and Team Leader, retired

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
Click Here
track your portfolio