Larry Swedroe

Wise Investing
Click Here

Why You Should Avoid Listening to Too Much Investment Noise

By Larry Swedroe | Aug 17, 2009 |

According to New York-based research firm Basex, information overload — the constant disruption of the work day with irrelevant material, including e-mails and meetings — costs us eight hours of productivity a week. When spread across the U.S. economy, these “unnecessary interruptions” cost $900 billion a year in lost productivity. While information overload can certainly produce a negative impact on your productivity, it can also have a negative effect on your returns.

Consider the following from Richard Bernstein. In his book Navigating the Noise, Bernstein writes: “Today’s investors find it inconceivable that life might be better without so much information. Investors find it hard to believe that ignoring the vast majority of investment noise might actually improve investment performance. The idea sounds too risky because it is so contrary to their accepted and reinforced actions.” What makes this quote of particular interest is that Bernstein used to be chief investment strategist at Merrill Lynch, a source of so much of the very noise he warns against.

Jason Zweig is the personal finance writer for The Wall Street Journal and one of the most respected in his field. You would be well served to follow the advice he provided:

“As I traipse around the country speaking to investing groups, or just stay in my cage writing my articles, I’m often accused of ’disempowering’ people because I refuse to give any credence to anyone’s hope of beating the market. The knowledge that I don’t need to know anything is an incredibly profound form of knowledge. Personally, I think it’s the ultimate form of empowerment. You can’t tune out the massive industry of investment prediction unless you want to: otherwise, you’ll never have the fortitude to stop listening. But if you can plug your ears to every attempt (by anyone) to predict what the markets will do, you will outperform nearly every other investor alive over the long run. Only the mantra of ’don’t know, and I don’t care’ will get you there.”

You’re best served by having a well-designed investment plan and then sticking to your plan like a postage stamp. Paying attention to investment information is highly likely to cause you to take counterproductive actions. The proof of that comes from studies showing that the returns earned by investors are well below the returns of the very funds in which they invest — a result caused by reacting to information that is nothing more than noise.

 
Reply to Story

MoneyWatch TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    MarkWolfinger

    08/19/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Why You Should Avoid Listening to Too Much Investment Noise

    If one is going to follow the ideas in the last paragraph, why would they also want to pay fees to an advisor or planner?

    Although the arguments against trying to beat the market are sound - the part I don't get is paying for advice that is just going to reduce your returns a bit more.

    Mark Wolfinger

  •  
    2

    CAM Advisor

    08/19/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Why You Should Avoid Listening to Too Much Investment Noise

    I would say the value of the advisor is found in holding the investor to the plan created. It goes back to behavioral finance that Larry discussed at the beginning of the post.

    Jason Zweig's book "Your Money & Your Brain" discusses several points about human behavior as it is related to investing. In short...humans (especially Americans) have a tendency to involve themselves in a process because that is what is ingrained in our minds from birth. As individuals, Zweig argues, we are taught that we can do things better, faster, stronger, than anyone else. This thought process bleeds to investing, and as soon as the market "changes", humans react.

    The value of the advisor is to keep their clients from making costly mistakes.

    As an additional point, Larry uses a very good example in his book "Wise Investing Made Simple" called "The Big Rocks". Simply put, would you rather spend your time checking your portfolio to make sure it is in balance, or would you rather spend time with family & friends (or whatever else you like to do)?

    But that is just my biased view.

  •  
    3

    larry swedroe

    08/19/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Why You Should Avoid Listening to Too Much Investment Noise

    Mark
    There are many ways a good financial (note I did not use the word investment advisor) advisor can add value.

    The first part is in educating investors on the winning strategy. The second is to help them to develop a well-thought-out plan, making sure they don't take more risk than they have the ability, willingness or need to take risk. That means knowing how to best estimate returns and running a sophisticated tool like a Monte Carlo Simulator to help with the decision making process.Then they can make sure the assets are in the right location. Then it is important to make the right choice of investment vehicles--and the industry technology is constantly changing. Right now for example, in my opinion DFA has the best technology with their core funds and the tax managed versions of those funds.

    Having done that the key is to stay disciplined to the plan. That means rebalancing when required and tax managing throughout the year--and doing both in the most cost and tax efficient manner.

    Then one should integrate that well-thought-out plan into an overall estate, tax and risk management plan. My firm for example even helps people with property, casualty and liability insurance (potentially saving clients thousands of dollars a year and/or improving gaps in coverage). A good financial advisor can also make sure you have the right amount of life insurance and the right type and the right carrier, and that can change over time.

    Then there are many other ways a good financial advisor can help. The following are just a few:
    College Funding, choice of 529 plans and who owns the assets
    Retirement planning
    Education on risks of investing
    Education on products--helping to avoid buying products meant to be sold and not bought (like VAs and EIAs and hedge funds and structured notes)
    Gifting to family members
    Charitable donations
    Developing family wealth missions statements so that parents can pass on their values to their children
    Mortgages
    Coordinating between attorneys and CPAs
    And of course saving time, the most precious of assets

    I hope the above is helpful

  •  
    4

    MarkWolfinger

    08/20/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Why You Should Avoid Listening to Too Much Investment Noise

    Larry,

    I see your points and they all make sense.

    Question: I know last year was an outlier, but how did plans tested by Monte Carlo simulation perform? How much better did they do than index funds (for example).

    From my perspective risk is not managed well by proper diversification and asset allocation. But my perspective is limited because I don't see the accounts of a bunch of people.

    Mark

  •  
    5

    larry swedroe

    08/20/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Why You Should Avoid Listening to Too Much Investment Noise

    Mark

    The returns of last year were within what a Monte Carlo simulation would expect. I don't know what you mean by did they do better than index funds. They are two entirely different things. MCS is not an investment vehicle like an index fund.

    The ONLY way to manage risk is by proper diversification, meaning you don't take more risk than you have the ability, willingness or need to take risk (see my books for tables on those) and that means making sure your portfolio has a sufficient amount of very high quality fixed income investments--that is part of prudent diversification.

    Then you need to broadly diversify your risky investments to eliminate if not minimize what is called unsystematic risk (diversifiable risk) because you don't get compensated with higher returns for taking such risks.

    Since we live in a world where we all have cloudy crystal balls that is the best we can do--focus on the things we can control: The amount of risk we take, costs and tax efficiency.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement

Larry Swedroe

Larry Swedroe is principal and director of research for The Buckingham Family of Financial Services. He has authored or co-authored seven books, including The Only Guide to a Winning Investment Strategy You'll Ever Need.

Larry Swedroe

Larry Swedroe is a principal and the director of research for Buckingham Asset Management and BAM Advisor Services. He has also worked with Prudential Home Mortgage and Citicorp, totaling nearly 40 years of managing financial risks for major corporations and advising individuals on ways to do the same.

His opinions and comments expressed on this site are his own and may not accurately reflect those of the firm.

Click Here
track your portfolio