Conrad deAenlle

Against the Grain
Click Here

As Investors Put Their Faith in the Rally, Can the End Be Far Away?

By Conrad de Aenlle | May 21, 2009 |

The stock market is famous for climbing a wall of worry after a bear market. Economic and corporate news continues to be awful, yet share prices shrug it off.

After reaching the top and surveying the grand vistas of prosperity, the market then descends a slope of hope. Some or all of the earlier progress is undone, even as the news becomes noticeably brighter.

In a recession like this, the worst in more than 70 years, the wall of worry can seem like the north face of the Eiger. The major averages have soared 40 percent or more amid the gloomiest earnings, employment and housing data in recent or not so recent memory.

So far, so good, but various indicators suggest that the summit is in sight, and even after the brutal bear market of the last couple of years, it’s a long way below. One analyst who follows a wide array of measures designed to track investor sentiment warns that anyone who has not yet left the base camp may be better off waiting until prices come back down to earth before attempting an ascent.

Gauges of the public’s mood, including surveys of professional opinion, investment flows into the market and expectations of volatility inferred from stock option prices, showed extreme skepticism during most of the rally that began in March, after stocks reached a 12-year low. Because these are contrary indicators - the more bullish investors are, the more likely stocks are to fall and vice versa - the readings, highlighted in earlier columns here and here, served as buy signals.

The tide appears to be turning. Peter Lee, chief technical analyst at UBS Financial Services, points out that recent readings on several measures display a sudden willingness among investors to believe what they see. The ratio of bulls to bears in the Investors Intelligence survey of newsletter editors is approaching its highest level in nearly a year, and the CBOE Volatility Index, where low numbers are a sign of calm and optimism among investors, has collapsed into the 20s after reaching a record high above 80 during the panic last fall.

End of the World - or Not

“Investors are swinging from outright pessimism, predicting the end of the world, and switching to the bullish camp,” Lee observed. “We think the Street is going to be so enthusiastic that sentiment numbers will overshoot to an extreme reading again, and that could produce another downdraft.”

He’s not advocating trading all your stocks in for canned goods and a shotgun. Signs of outright bullishness are not there yet, leaving open the chance that share prices could creep up the wall of worry to the tune of an additional 5 to 10 percent, in his view.

Lee expects the market to run into heavy selling before the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index makes it past 1,000, around where it stood on Election Day. The index, which has been hovering around 900, could fall to between 740 and 800 later in the year, he predicts.

“That’s a neutral call,” he said, factoring in the potential gains and losses. “Ask any trader out there and he’ll tell you he wouldn’t place a trade unless there’s a 2-to-1 ratio of reward to risk.”

If he’s right, investors will confidently, optimistically watch their money vanish as they rappel down the slope of hope. Eventually, maybe in the fall, when markets often hit significant lows, sentiment readings are likely to reverse course again as investors who made the wrong decision one ore time give up on stocks.

“The next sell-off could surprise them and that could be a lasting bottom,” Lee predicted. “The majority of investors are wrong at major pivot points. They’re bullish at the peak and bearish at the trough.”

 
Reply to Story

MoneyWatch TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via Email or RSS

  •  
    1

    vam1014

    05/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: As Investors Put Their Faith in the Rally at Last, Can the End Be Far Away?

    How good are those volatility indexes? Given the rapidity with which information is spread around these days, are they comparable with even five or six years ago? Wouldn't we expect to see bigger swings of shorter duration in the era of ubiquitous SMS and Twitter?

  •  
    2

    deaenlle

    05/26/09 | Report as spam

    RE: As Investors Put Their Faith in the Rally at Last, Can the End Be Far Away?

    Vam,

    The VIX certainly would have sucked a lot of investors into stocks well before they hit bottom last fall. It soared above 50, often considered a point at which stocks can be counted on to rally, and went into the 80s for the first time ever as the market continued to sink. In the long run, investors who bought when the VIX hit 50 may be rewarded, but for now they?re underwater.

    In general, though, sentiment indicators work because many investors find reasons to think that the old rules no longer apply. They believe, as the clich? has it, that ?this time it?s different.? But it is very rarely different. These indicators are merely gauging people?s emotions, and people don?t change.

  •  
    3

    deaenlle

    06/05/09 | Report as spam

    RE: As Investors Put Their Faith in the Rally at Last, Can the End Be Far Away?

    This comment was received via email from Tom Rocco:

    I read your latest column and could not tell for sure whether you are just finding the ideas of Peter Lee interesting or you more or less agree with him. I for one would like to know what you think.

    Two and a half years ago, in December 2006, you wrote a column that made a significant difference to me ?2007: Be Afraid? and I became so. Then, too, you used other economists as point of departure, but I thought I could tell where you stood and I would like to know now where you stand on the prospects for a continuing recovery, a sharp downturn or a period of more or less stable markets.

    I would also like to know how you think the president?s plans for recovery are likely to fare. The problems you presaged in the December 2006 article were/are systemic rather than cyclical and I am interested in whether you think there are significant changes in the plans that will make the financial systems function more effectively in service to what is often now called the ?real economy.?

    Hoping to hear from you and or to see some of this addressed in your columns.

    Tom Rocco


    Conrad here:

    First, thanks for the kind words, but I make no claim to know what the markets or the economy will do. I?ve spent nearly 20 years interviewing people who have expertise in the field, so I can often tell when people make sense and when they don?t, and I?ve got some understanding of market history and a bit of common sense. But that?s all.

    For what it?s worth, I do agree with Lee. Investors seemed to treat the rally off the March low as a dead-cat bounce. It was only after the big move leveled off that they started to believe that the feline was flying. That suggests that a pullback is due. There are no guarantees, of course, and it doesn?t help to answer the more important question of where stocks and the economy go in the long run. If history continues to serve as a guide, then further recovery in share prices, either now or soon, seems likely.

    As for whether the administration?s program to aid the economy will work, well, I?m far from an expert on that subject either. I suspect that investors are taking comfort in the fact that the people in charge are ?doing something? and that this, more than the actual effect of the steps being taken, will help the economy and markets. They might contract a case of buyer?s remorse after a while when the bill comes due in the form of higher taxes and/or higher interest rates on government debt.

    The kitchen sink of new regulation that almost certainly is on its way may put a drag on economic growth over the long haul. For a take on whether new regulation is likely to work as planned, have a look at this International Herald Tribune story that ran last fall: http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/09/19/business/wbreg.php

    And for another perspective on the markets and the psychology of investing, check out the posts above this one.

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
advertisement

Conrad deAenlle

Conrad de Aenlle has been an investment and personal finance writer for nearly 20 years, covering international markets, portfolio management, and financial planning, among other topics. His features and columns have appeared in newspapers and magazines worldwide, including The New York Times, International Herald Tribune, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, Sunday Business, The Scotsman, Institutional Investor, Funds Europe, and International Fund Investment. After working in London and Paris for 14 years, de Aenlle is based in Long Beach, Calif.

Conrad deAenlle

Click Here
track your portfolio