Investment Strategist: Keep Buying Stocks

James Paulsen

A few wise market commentators, including our own Allan Roth and Conrad de Aenlle, think a stock market pullback is possible after the recent big run-up. But Wells Capital Management’s chief investment strategist, James Paulsen, says now is actually the time to keep buying. Strong corporate earnings, the stimulus from Washington, and improved investment sentiment are all going to pull in large amounts of cash from the sidelines and keep this rally going, according to Paulsen. “When everyone believes risk is high, the reality is that risk is actually low; investors should take advantage of that,” he says.

Paulsen, who’s written a popular monthly newsletter on the market for the past 25 years, underestimated how badly the credit crisis would hurt the U.S. economy and stock market. He’s been conspicuously bullish since the start of this run, however, and he has a good track record for spotting bullish turns, having predicted the market rally following 9/11 and the bursting of the tech bubble.

Paulsen spoke to MoneyWatch.com contributor Jeff Nash last week about what’s driving the rise in stock prices, what investors should be doing with their portfolios, and what sectors of the market he particularly likes.

What do you make of this rally?

Our leadership in this country basically created a run on bank stocks when they entertained a public discussion about nationalizing the banks. As soon as public officials came out and said they weren’t going to go through with that plan, we bounced back out of it. So did we really have a 50 percent rally, or did we just have a dipsy doodle created by Washington? The other thing that’s happened is the market has taken the fear of the “second coming of the Depression” out of the equation. So we’re up 50 percent from March, but are still essentially flat for the past 10 months. We’re very early in turning this corner.

Considering all the bad news still out there, how can you be so bullish?

At the end of a recession, the numbers are always terrible. They have to be terrible, almost by definition, or else you’re not really at the bottom. That said, the recent earnings season was phenomenally better than expected. We’ve had a tremendous 100,000-plus drop in initial weekly unemployment claims, layoff announcements are down to levels seen before the crisis, and housing activity has even started to come back to life a bit after free-falling. Not to mention the Wall Street signals: Bond spreads have narrowed, stocks are up, and cyclical stocks are leading. There just seems to me to be an overwhelming amount of evidence from Wall Street and Main Street that the recession has ended. But there’s always a lot of doubt at the end of a recession.

So how should investors position their portfolios?

I would try to focus on the next two to three years. The key is to tilt your asset allocation a little, not to make sweeping changes. Investors shouldn’t have gone outside their risk parameters during the bear market, either. That said, you should be overweight risky assets, including equities. In the near term, I also like small-cap stocks. The biggest beneficiary of U.S. trade improving is a small, domestically domiciled company, because trade improvement means the domestic marketplace expands. And if there is any inflationary fallout from the stimulus plan, small caps typically do better than large caps as inflationary pressures build.

How much of this recovery do you think has been fueled by the stimulus plan?

I would argue that so far it has nothing to do with the policy stimulus. Most of the stimulus we dumped into the economy didn’t occur until the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September, and it takes, on average, at least a year for these policies to have an impact. So we’re not even at the point where most of it would start to show up, and I’m not even talking about Obama’s $787 billion plan, which won’t show up until 2010. All that juice is still coming. The recovery so far has more to do with healthy players calming down. People who have jobs and are financially in good shape are spending again. And well-capitalized companies are less concerned now with cutting jobs and scaling back operations.

So it’s not too late to buy stocks?

Yes, but you need a long-term view. There will be some consolidation and scary sell-offs. Any stable recovery gives you gut checks along the way. But the fundamentals — the policy push from Washington, the improving investor sentiment, the better-than-expected corporate earnings — all suggest to me there’s more room on the upside over time. On top of that, the great bulk of investors are underinvested in stocks right now. At some point, maybe when the S&P 500 hits 1,050 or 1,100, there will be a conversion of bears to bulls. Right now, we have investors who are underexposed to risky assets, so there’s a lot of excess dry powder that could come in and push the market higher.

You’ve compared this market to the 1982 recovery, which initiated a 20-year bull market. Do you see something similar happening now?

I hope so, but I can’t predict that. All I was saying is that the character of sentiment that existed then is similar to today. It, too, was tagged as the worst recession since the Great Depression. Banks were riddled with problems from farming, oil, and Third World debt, and confidence collapsed. The stock market went up about 75 percent by the summer of 1983 before a majority of investors agreed the recession was over. They got in the market just in time for the pullback. We caution investors today not to wait too long to re-enter the stock market for the same reason. There’s lots of evidence of recovery right now, but nobody’s buying into it.

What segments of the stock market do you like in the near term?

I like stocks in more economically sensitive areas that will benefit from earnings leverage from overcutting during the recession. My favorites are industrials, basic materials, consumer discretionary, and financials. I still like technology too, although many stocks are now extended.

This recovery cycle will not be valuation-driven, but earnings-driven. And companies in these sectors I mentioned have great earnings leverage from slashing inventories, workforces, and capital spending. They’ve become more mean and lean.

You’ve been bullish on emerging markets. Do you still see value there, despite the huge rallies in many markets this year?

Emerging markets are extended. They could suffer a bigger pullback, but longer term they were the leader as this decade began and they will remain the leader. They’re operating with young demographics that have high savings, low debt, and high aspirations. They are the epicenter of world growth, and they’ll continue to be that. I also think commodity markets are likely to receive another boost, and these markets will benefit.

More on MoneyWatch:

 

MoneyWatch TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Please add your comment:

  1. You are currently: a Guest |
  2.  

Basic HTML tags that work in comments are: bold (<b></b>), italic (<i></i>), underline (<u></u>), and hyperlink (<a href></a)

advertisement
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
  • Click Here
Click Here
track your portfolio